Grassroots groups and peace processes theme group

We tried to give each morning a
similar format, and break the heaviness by doing things a bit creatively or
having a game, a break or some music. Each day we spent some time looking at
particular aspects of the theme and a particular geographical conflict; on the
latter we were able to 'do' Euskadi (Basque Country), Croatia, Bosnia
Herzegovina, Kosovo, Chad, and Northern Ireland; sometimes it was a general
exploration, sometimes more focused on our theme. The participants in the theme
group were mainly European. More general aspects of the theme which we tried to
explore included stages of peace processes (a list of stages was developed
specifically for this group and used for a barometer/spectrum exercise),
gender, the possibility of influencing political processes, the role of NGOs,
economics etc.

'Neutrality' or impartiality was an issue of importance. No one really went for
the term 'neutral', and 'impartiality' did not necessarily fit in all cases, or
was not appropriate to the work some people were doing. Economics was felt to
be an area which was ignored by peace activists but could be more fruitfully
explored. The importance of strengthening indigenous grassroots groups in
conflict areas rather than assuming 'we' had to rush in to intervene was an
important point. On gender, we shared the different situations of women in
relation to power and grassroots groups in our varied situations.

Even ten of eleven hours is short for dealing with a topic of this nature, and
many questions were left not dealt with. Concluding questions and comments
included:

• Our position on military intervention in Kosovo. While people were not
  going to call for NATO intervention there was a realisation of the limited
  possibilities for 'us' at this stage.
• Nonviolent interposition in the process of nonviolent action.
• Co-option of peace groups into government agendas. Northern Ireland was
  particularly in mind in this regard.
• Peace work with both sides (the oppressor too). The need for work on the
  'side' of the 'oppressor' came across quite clearly. But then there are
  'oppressed' within the side of the 'oppressor too, and it may be more useful to
  talk about 'oppressor elites'.
• Worn out activists involvement in other conflicts -- share their
  experience and resources.
• Strategic planning on conflict prevention to efficiently prevent war. That
  is, intervening when we can actually have an effect rather than too late.
• What are the channels and bridges for peace groups and mainstream society?
  Schools, churches etc.