N. v. Sweden (10410/83) - inadmissibility decision


A pacifist, the applicant was convicted for refusing to perform compulsory military service. He did not ask for a possibility to perform substitute civilian service. Before the Commission, he alleged to be a victim of discrimination, since members of various religious groups were exempted from service while philosophical reasons such as being a pacifist did not constitute valid grounds for discharging him from his obligation to serve in the army.

The Commission declared the case inadmissible. It did not find an appearance of a violation of Article 14 in conjunction with Article 9 of the Convention, stating that it was not discriminatory to limit full exemption from military service and substitute civil service to conscientious objectors belonging to a religious community which required of its members general and strict discipline, both spiritual and moral.

Source: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-74737

Attached file
N. v. SWEDEN.pdf362.13 KB

Add new comment

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

8 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.